Monday, September 21, 2009

An Epiphany



Studying is definitely not conducive to blogging. I've discovered this unfortunate fact as I plow through a full semester of 20 credits and 10 Spanish Labs to oversee; things are definitely getting crazy. Nevertheless, I wanted to put an update on here. I am currently reading The 5,000 Year Leap; a book I think that every American aught to read from cover to cover. I am not even completely through it and yet I am convinced it is the most concise, understandable summary to date of the lasting qualities of the founding documents of this nation. The book details how the words written on the famed pieces of parchment paper catapulted a nation into a completely new age; an age brought on by the prudent recognition of Natural Law as a foundation for our free land. The book details 28 basic principles key to understanding these documents and the men behind them, and their plan to keep this nation within the safeguards of liberty for generations to come:


"The questions we face were foreseen by the greatest group of Americans to ever live; our Founding Fathers. They knew we would be grappling with issues like the ones we face today at some point, so they designed a shop that could withstand even the mightiest storm. They also knew that we would eventually lose our way and that we would need a beacon to lead our way back. I have often wondered why the constitution appears as it does. Why those three words "We the people" are so large. After all, it's not like James Madison wrote those three words then realized, "Oh shoot, I can't use this sized font or we'll run out of space!" They did it for a reason. The answer is not the government, it's not a politician, it's not a policy; it's always, "We the people." (Foward, Glenn Beck)


We the People.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

"I see that you've broken your foot clean off your leg, m'am, but you'll have to take a number......"


(Image by Michael Ramirez)

I hate that I have virtually no time to post on this blog, but I am busy getting ready to help in getting our country back! I need a good education to do this, and that generally means less and less time for anything not school related. I recently told a classmate that I think I'm losing the battle with the 24 hour day....I think I assumed that I could take on a gigantic load and somehow convince the day to give me a few more hours. Well, 12 more, to be exact. Unfortunately, I'm not God, and I'm not Joshua fighting a war against Israel's enemies. You know....the day the sun stood still. Well, enough with the symbolic speech....and on with the blog post!
I felt that I really do need to post about this topic despite my lack of time (and despite the fact that I'm supposed to be studying topographical maps right now) as I feel that it paints a dismal picture of what is to come if the democrats bent on the government "option" (and i say "option" tentatively as I do not believe this idea of "choosing" it will always be the case) get their way.


My mother-in-law Ruth recently had surgery for a horrible accident she had in which she completely broke the bones in her ankle to the point of internal appendage detachment. In other words, she broke her foot off internally. This surgery took place yesterday; and while her foot is now connected once again with the rest of her leg, she will probably be physically handicapped for the rest of her life. Why is this, one might ask? Rewind to one week ago, and you will soon see.


Ruth broke her foot LAST WEEK. Wednesday, to be exact. How is it that she just had surgery last night, one might ask? Why, I have an answer for you! Socialized medicine! National Health Care! Mexico currently "enjoys" a system quite similar to the government option that is currently being proposed by our Dear Leader and his minions. Let me enlighten you as to exactly how IMSS (their government-run health system) works, as I ponder my mother-in-law's experience as well as my own unpleasant encounters with that system during my time in Mexico. Picture a room full of patients waiting to be seen, each with injuries or illnesses meriting immediate attention. The room is dingy, poorly kept up, and the crowd within feels much more like a herd of cattle than they do patients. Each has a so-called "number" assigned to their turn with the doctors. Ruth sat a full 24 hours in a waiting area before even being given a room. She was told not to eat anything (adding to her discomfort) as they hoped to get her into surgery ASAP. That hope quickly faded, as the hours and hours passed and it became clear that she would not be seeing a surgeon ANYTIME soon. Upon hearing this, my grandmother wondered "Well, if they are having her wait it must mean that they don't think that the case is too dangerous or something." No no no. It has nothing to do with severity. Someone could come in bleeding profusely and it would still take some time to get a doctor. The fact of the matter is simply this: Mexico put a system in place that would grant (via tax payer dollars) FREE health care for everyone. What they failed to realize is that by doing this, the patient count per hospital increased by the thousands while the number of doctors stayed relatively the same. Costs and ethical concerns aside, one could oppose the current health reform on this basis alone!! Rather than simply reform a system to make a run more smoothly, the Mexican government took it upon themselves to be the so-called benafactors of the nation, while taxing them into oblivion and providing shoddy health care in return. By the way, I do not want to forget to mention this- the only reason that Ruth even got into surgery a week after the incident (quite soon, by most counts) was that her personal doctor just happens to be "high up" in the government system. He was therefore able to have some influence. A friend of Ruth's told her a story of a family member who was not so fortunate- he waited for two weeks before receiving treatment for his broken bone. He now suffers the consequences.


There are those who would criticize my comparison of Congress' reform plan with Mexico's system. They might simply say- "Mexico is a third world country. No wonder it didn't work there!" Fair enough, Mexico's government is a corrupt, poor, and underdeveloped system. However, may I direct people's attention to nations such as Canada or Great Britain (who, by all counts are considered FIRST WORLD NATIONS) in which the case I described above is not uncommon. I can remember watching stories on the news of people in the exact same predicament. In particular, there was a young man who now has a permanent handicap due to what was originally a fairly common rugby injury, simply because HE COULD NOT BE SEEN by a doctor. There simply weren't enough, and the system was simply bogged down. Now, I ask you to look at the population of the United States, which reaches numbers far beyond that of Mexico, Canada, and Great Britain. I cannot name a single government program that has worked totally successfully on specific numbers of the population (i.e. the VA, Medicare/Medicaid, Social Security, etc.), and to imagine that the government could somehow take on the entire population is absolutely ludicris.


Wednesday, September 2, 2009

G O L !

(Image: Greenburg)

Well, well, well. This one REALLY surprises me! No, REALLY. REALLY. Pshh..yeah.


Ladies and Gentlemen, I present you with the following: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/


A bill that would give the president the authority to shut down the internet if he deems any situation to be particularly "dangerous" to the cyber security of the nation. By the way, what is deemed "dangerous" is fairly ambiguous. In other words--well, you get the picture. At any rate, it may sound benign enough to the untrained ear, especially if it is in the name of our national security; however, it paints an ominious picture of the plans our current leader has for our nation. In my (untrained) opinion the issue merits two questions.


First- don't the private (whoops...my bad....apparently "private" anything is becoming a little too PI: "Politically Incorrect") internet companies have a responsibility to their paying customers to keep things safe? Isn't making sure that the procedures that they have in place for the cyber security of their users are of the highest grade, in their best interest as a private (uh oh, there's that bad word again...) company? Well people, we already have Government Motors, Government Industry, Government Enviroment, and the Dems have their fingers crossed for Dr. Government as well.......so what the heck- why not toss in GOL! (Government Online, for those of you still catching up)


Secondly- I think that it's time to play a little "name that successful Obama program," after which point we can talk about whether or not giving the president carte blanche as to usage of the country's cyber on/off switch is a safe decision. . . . . . . . . . . .

Well, as I can't seem to think of any, I don't quite see how we are supposed to trust him that he'll use that authority ONLY in the event of an emergency. To put this into perspective.....what scares me so much is that he and his entire administration, and the far left Congress has spent the entire summer telling America that those of us who speak out against this exponential governmental growth are domestic terrorists, dissenters, radicals, and rioters. We "functionally retarded conservative right wing activists" spent the entire summer be told to shut up. We spent the entire summer being quieted. We spent the summer being told that by speaking out through the various channels (internet blogs, talk shows, town halls) we were behaving in an "un American" manner. Obama and his supporters have used every method short of full-on violence to shut us up this summer! Wouldn't it simply be easier to close down people's websites? Talk radio? Conservative news sources? That's what China (among other communist nations) currently does- Chinese citizens can access internet that the government has pre-approved. If you try accessing anything else....beware. I'm not saying we are there yet.....but if I've said it once I'll say it till doomsday- the signs are all there. Giving the president this kind of power over the American people is not only unprecedented in nature but is absolutely dangerous. The words I and so many others like me type at this very moment will be silenced with the swift movement of a pen unless the American people stand up and fight for what is right.


Yes, our enemies are real, and they would like to see us fall. There are many ways in which they would like to perpetrate our cyber world. There is not, however, the need for a bill to be passed into law which gives the president of our country the right to control the internet at his whim. Whatever happened to the CIA, and their purpose for existence? Oh, that's right....they must be too busy trying to stay afloat while Washington D.C. punishes them for keeping us safe for 8 full years. How shameful.